From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/5624 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Szabolcs Nagy Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Locale bikeshed time Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 19:47:06 +0200 Message-ID: <20140726174706.GF10402@port70.net> References: <20140724153526.GH16795@example.net> <20140724160150.GA4038@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20140724201548.GM16795@example.net> <20140724220228.GB4038@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20140725090649.GN16795@example.net> <20140725201551.GQ16795@example.net> <20140725223239.GG4038@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20140726072502.GR16795@example.net> <20140726080327.GJ4038@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20140726093805.GS16795@example.net> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1406396847 25350 80.91.229.3 (26 Jul 2014 17:47:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 17:47:27 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-5629-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sat Jul 26 19:47:20 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XB63z-0001QA-Vz for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 19:47:20 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 3778 invoked by uid 550); 26 Jul 2014 17:47:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 3770 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2014 17:47:18 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140726093805.GS16795@example.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:5624 Archived-At: * u-igbb@aetey.se [2014-07-26 11:38:05 +0200]: > On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 04:03:27AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > > Well, 2/3 of the world's population is in India and China and they all > > use ".", so I think that pretty much covers the question of which is > > "more widely used". > > Ah indeed. That's a sufficient evidence. > world is about 7G india+china is about 2.5G that looks closer to 1/3 than to 2/3 but using anything other than '.' as the decimal point is broken