From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/5629 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: u-igbb@aetey.se Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Locale bikeshed time Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 20:59:04 +0200 Message-ID: <20140726185904.GZ16795@example.net> References: <20140724201548.GM16795@example.net> <20140724220228.GB4038@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20140725090649.GN16795@example.net> <20140725201551.GQ16795@example.net> <20140725223239.GG4038@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20140726072502.GR16795@example.net> <20140726080327.GJ4038@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20140726093805.GS16795@example.net> <20140726174706.GF10402@port70.net> <20140726182348.GN4038@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1406401172 9909 80.91.229.3 (26 Jul 2014 18:59:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 18:59:32 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-5634-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sat Jul 26 20:59:25 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XB7Bk-0002tz-IB for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 20:59:24 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 18259 invoked by uid 550); 26 Jul 2014 18:59:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 18251 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2014 18:59:23 -0000 X-T2-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 Received-SPF: none receiver=mailfe08.swip.net; client-ip=178.63.154.93; envelope-from=u-igbb@aetey.se Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140726182348.GN4038@brightrain.aerifal.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:5629 Archived-At: On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 02:23:48PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > > but using anything other than '.' as the decimal point is broken > > Agreed. BTW if you support arbitrary radix characters, you should not > restrict it to ASCII; this then means the length in bytes of floating I think there is some international recommendations which actually say "either '.' or ',' but not anything else". Rune