From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/5658 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rich Felker Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: More GNU semantics for getopt_long? Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 14:35:46 -0400 Message-ID: <20140727183546.GC4038@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: <20140726091236.GA6011@euler> <20140726093140.GM4038@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20140726174730.GA11205@euler> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1406486167 3429 80.91.229.3 (27 Jul 2014 18:36:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 18:36:07 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-5663-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sun Jul 27 20:36:00 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XBTIe-00088V-7L for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 20:36:00 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 29908 invoked by uid 550); 27 Jul 2014 18:35:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 29899 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2014 18:35:59 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140726174730.GA11205@euler> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Original-Sender: Rich Felker Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:5658 Archived-At: On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 07:48:30PM +0200, Felix Janda wrote: > > > It seems difficult to upstream any of these. The config test > > > seems like a test specific to exclude musl and the second is > > > likely to break in the future and who knows what scripts might > > > depend on the argument reordering of widl. > > > > > > > > > No abbreviations: > > > > Oh, there was a patch submitted for this one, and I thought I > > remembered applying it, but perhaps not. I'll go back and look. There > > might have still been some open issues with it to be resolved before > > applying. > > > > > I noticed that there is a patch from Michael Forney on the mailing > > > list implementing the abbreviated options but there were not any > > > comments on it. > > > > Yes that's it. > > Thanks for revisiting the patch. Have you tried it and confirmed that it solves your problem and doesn't introduce any bugs that you immediately notice? I'd like to include it in the upcoming release but I don't want to introduce a stupid regression from lack of testing... Rich