From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/5840 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rich Felker Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: compiling musl on x86_64 linux with pcc Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 10:20:56 -0400 Message-ID: <20140814142056.GX12888@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: <20140813091843.GD5170@example.net> <20140813123832.GK12888@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20140813125607.GK5170@example.net> <20140813142332.GN12888@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20140814071055.GN5170@example.net> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1408026085 21008 80.91.229.3 (14 Aug 2014 14:21:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 14:21:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: musl@lists.openwall.com To: u-igbb@aetey.se Original-X-From: musl-return-5846-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Thu Aug 14 16:21:19 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XHvty-0007PM-UW for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 16:21:15 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 3606 invoked by uid 550); 14 Aug 2014 14:21:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 3594 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2014 14:21:12 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140814071055.GN5170@example.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Original-Sender: Rich Felker Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:5840 Archived-At: On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 09:10:55AM +0200, u-igbb@aetey.se wrote: > On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:23:32AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > > > I'd like to also have a tcc-based one but musl seems to be too hard > > > a target for tcc yet :( sigh. > > > > I think tcc has a long ways to go... But pcc was working in the past > > (at least on 32-bit) and should work. > > AFAICT tcc can not even _use_ musl (i.e. build programs to be linked to > musl) as musl relies on __builtin_va_list. > > That's a pity. Wonder whether it would cost too much to make > __builtin_va_list non-mandatory? How else would you do it? There's no real alternative. Rich