From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/5892 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: u-igbb@aetey.se Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: compiling musl on x86_64 linux with pcc Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 10:34:57 +0200 Message-ID: <20140825083457.GC12376@example.net> References: <20140813091843.GD5170@example.net> <20140813123832.GK12888@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20140813125607.GK5170@example.net> <20140813142332.GN12888@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20140825082807.GB12376@example.net> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1408955729 4542 80.91.229.3 (25 Aug 2014 08:35:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 08:35:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: musl@lists.openwall.com To: Rich Felker Original-X-From: musl-return-5898-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Mon Aug 25 10:35:23 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XLpkH-0003Lg-Do for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 10:35:21 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 32159 invoked by uid 550); 25 Aug 2014 08:35:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 32151 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2014 08:35:17 -0000 X-T2-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 Received-SPF: none receiver=mailfe01.swip.net; client-ip=78.108.63.44; envelope-from=u-igbb@aetey.se Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140825082807.GB12376@example.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:5892 Archived-At: On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 10:28:08AM +0200, u-igbb@aetey.se wrote: > Do you have a reference to which versions of musl and pcc > did work together? (May be the musl compilation went through, like > it does now, but the resulting library was not fully healthy either?) Found http://www.etalabs.net/musl/oldversions.html which says that musl-0.7.10.tar.gz - May 17, 2011 was good with pcc (presumably of the same time). I guess too much happened since then on both sides. :( Rune