From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/5930 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: u-igbb@aetey.se Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: compiling musl with pcc (i486-pc-linux-gnu) (was: [musl] compiling musl on x86_64 linux with pcc) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 16:38:58 +0200 Message-ID: <20140827143857.GM12376@example.net> References: <20140813091843.GD5170@example.net> <20140813123832.GK12888@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20140813125607.GK5170@example.net> <20140813142332.GN12888@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20140825082807.GB12376@example.net> <20140825083457.GC12376@example.net> <20140825154617.GV12888@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1409150365 3501 80.91.229.3 (27 Aug 2014 14:39:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 14:39:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: musl@lists.openwall.com To: Rich Felker Original-X-From: musl-return-5937-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Wed Aug 27 16:39:20 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XMeNb-0004p0-UE for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 16:39:20 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 7578 invoked by uid 550); 27 Aug 2014 14:39:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 7570 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2014 14:39:18 -0000 X-T2-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 Received-SPF: none receiver=mailfe07.swip.net; client-ip=46.10.205.252; envelope-from=u-igbb@aetey.se Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140825154617.GV12888@brightrain.aerifal.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:5930 Archived-At: On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 11:46:17AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > I have pcc 1.1.0.DEVEL 20130227 with pcc-libs-20130721 and it seems to > still work fine with current musl. Note that some fixes are needed for I have got a musl instance compiled with pcc which seems to be usable. A pcc compiled and linked against it reproduces itself and then reproduces the same code for musl. The catch: Using --enable-optimize=no leads to a broken library (at least concerning the variadic arguments). > I just ran libc-test with libc.so built by pcc and confirmed that > there are no non-math regressions versus gcc-built libc.so. (I did not > check math in detail because there are lots of known math failures > that are not serious.) Now we know that this is possible with the current version as well, but not without optimization :) Regards, Rune