From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/5966
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@port70.net>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: C threads, v. 6.2
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 22:55:12 +0200
Message-ID: <20140828205510.GA27258@port70.net>
References: <1409177505.4476.75.camel@eris.loria.fr>
 <20140827234657.GW12888@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <1409218850.4476.96.camel@eris.loria.fr>
 <20140828161552.GY12888@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <1409254089.4476.137.camel@eris.loria.fr>
 <20140828200029.GA12888@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1409259331 26700 80.91.229.3 (28 Aug 2014 20:55:31 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 20:55:31 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-5973-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Thu Aug 28 22:55:26 2014
Return-path: <musl-return-5973-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-5973-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1XN6j7-0000Ms-Nw
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 22:55:25 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 18039 invoked by uid 550); 28 Aug 2014 20:55:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 18029 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2014 20:55:24 -0000
Mail-Followup-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140828200029.GA12888@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:5966
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/5966>

* Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> [2014-08-28 16:00:29 -0400]:
> I was asking whether the use of static to mean "pointer to at least
> this many elements" used for an argument in a function type resulted
> in a distinct function type from the same without static.

no the type is not different, there is an example in the standard:

http://port70.net/~nsz/c/c11/n1570.html#6.7.6.3p21

the semantics is defined in

http://port70.net/~nsz/c/c11/n1570.html#6.7.6.3p7