From: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: C threads, v. 6.2
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 11:57:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140829155744.GH12888@brightrain.aerifal.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1409299363.4476.164.camel@eris.loria.fr>
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 10:02:43AM +0200, Jens Gustedt wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 29.08.2014, 09:56 +0200 schrieb Jens Gustedt:
> > All of this would explode in our face the day a user wants to use
> > pthread_mutex_t and mtx_t in the same application. A use case could be
> > that he uses one library that protects CS with pthread_mutex_t and
> > another that uses mtx_t. Now suddenly we have code that sees two
> > different types, with possibly subtle bugs due to aliasing.
> >
> > So in conclusion, it is doable, but I don't like it at all.
>
> To give it a positive turn, for the moment I'd prefer to roll this
> back and have the two types pthread_mutex_t and pthread_cond_t violate
> the namespace rules of libc for the moment. This is not perfect, but
> also not a serious drawback.
>
> This would have the advantage of being conservative on the pthread
> side and not to delay the schedule.
I don't think this is an acceptable way to proceed. It creates a
C++ ABI that we're planning to remove by changing the struct tags for
these types later (fixing the namespace issue will necessarily break
the C++ ABI).
Rich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-29 15:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-27 22:11 Jens Gustedt
2014-08-27 23:46 ` Rich Felker
2014-08-28 9:40 ` Jens Gustedt
2014-08-28 11:41 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2014-08-28 16:15 ` Rich Felker
2014-08-28 19:28 ` Jens Gustedt
2014-08-28 20:00 ` Rich Felker
2014-08-28 20:55 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2014-08-28 21:38 ` Jens Gustedt
2014-08-28 21:34 ` Jens Gustedt
2014-08-28 21:56 ` Rich Felker
2014-08-28 23:25 ` Jens Gustedt
2014-08-28 23:38 ` Rich Felker
2014-08-29 7:56 ` Jens Gustedt
2014-08-29 8:02 ` Jens Gustedt
2014-08-29 15:57 ` Rich Felker [this message]
2014-08-29 19:01 ` Jens Gustedt
2014-08-30 5:30 ` Rich Felker
2014-08-30 7:43 ` Jens Gustedt
2014-08-30 8:54 ` Jens Gustedt
2014-08-31 0:30 ` Rich Felker
2014-08-31 1:31 ` Rich Felker
2014-08-31 2:44 ` Rich Felker
2014-08-31 7:09 ` Jens Gustedt
2014-08-29 15:56 ` Rich Felker
2014-08-29 18:40 ` Jens Gustedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140829155744.GH12888@brightrain.aerifal.cx \
--to=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=musl@lists.openwall.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/musl/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).