From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/6509 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rich Felker Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: [PATCH] implement a private state for the uchar.h functions Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 15:10:47 -0500 Message-ID: <20141115201047.GO22465@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: <1415528228.2457.1188.camel@eris.loria.fr> <20141115172914.GN22465@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <1416074241.31338.82.camel@eris.loria.fr> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416082269 606 80.91.229.3 (15 Nov 2014 20:11:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 20:11:09 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-6522-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sat Nov 15 21:11:03 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XpjgT-0004g9-De for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 21:11:01 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 32295 invoked by uid 550); 15 Nov 2014 20:10:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 32283 invoked from network); 15 Nov 2014 20:10:59 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1416074241.31338.82.camel@eris.loria.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Original-Sender: Rich Felker Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:6509 Archived-At: On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 06:57:21PM +0100, Jens Gustedt wrote: > Am Samstag, den 15.11.2014, 12:29 -0500 schrieb Rich Felker: > > > - The functions c32rtomb and mbrtoc32 used the private states of wcrtomb > > > and mbrtowc, respectively, which they are not allowed to do. > > > > One small correction: wcrtomb has no state, and c32rtomb does not need > > any either. > > right, so the corrected phrase would be > > - the function mbrtoc32 uses the private state of mbrtowc, which it > is not allowed to do. > > thanks Committing with this change. Thanks! Rich