From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/6817 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rich Felker Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: musl built with pcc yields segfaults in dynlink.c Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 21:16:48 -0500 Message-ID: <20150108021648.GP4574@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: <20150106074849.GA25889@newbook> <20150106204924.GM4574@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20150106225647.GA2194@newbook> <20150107005357.GN4574@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20150107020107.GA2336@newbook> <20150107053316.GO4574@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1420683444 20311 80.91.229.3 (8 Jan 2015 02:17:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 02:17:24 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-6830-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Thu Jan 08 03:17:19 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Y92el-0003OO-0p for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 03:17:03 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 11848 invoked by uid 550); 8 Jan 2015 02:17:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 11833 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2015 02:17:01 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Original-Sender: Rich Felker Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:6817 Archived-At: On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 12:48:13AM -0500, stephen Turner wrote: > > I wonder if pcc is generating bogus code for functions which return > > structures... > > > > Rich > > Didnt they recently made a code change to x86? Not sure. It would be a good idea to try somewhat older versions and see when it broke. I still have pcc 1.1.0.DEVEL 20130227 and the problem does not exist in that version, but of course that's pretty old. Rich