From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/7038 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rich Felker Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: What would make musl 1.2? Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 21:44:19 -0500 Message-ID: <20150215024419.GL23507@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: <20150213074603.GA975@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <54DFD90D.3040009@openwrt.org> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1423968281 30552 80.91.229.3 (15 Feb 2015 02:44:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 02:44:41 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-7051-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sun Feb 15 03:44:40 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YMpCH-0005d7-SC for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 03:44:38 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 15920 invoked by uid 550); 15 Feb 2015 02:44:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 15877 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2015 02:44:32 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54DFD90D.3040009@openwrt.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Original-Sender: Rich Felker Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:7038 Archived-At: On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 10:23:57AM +1100, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2015-02-14 00:02, Justin Cormack wrote: > > Oh I forgot to check the openwrt platform support list which is relevant > > > > https://dev.openwrt.org/wiki/platforms > > > > The missing ones there are avr32, mips64, ppc64. > avr32 doesn't really seem to be widely used, It's probably worth > skipping that one. For OpenWrt, mips64 would probably be the most > important one among the missing platforms. You can always run 32bit code on a mips64 machine though. I can't imagine any OpenWRT targets having large enough resources that you'd actually want LP64. IMO mips64 is only interesting for desktop/server systems. Rich