From: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Masked cancellation mode draft
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 14:10:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150222191000.GZ23507@brightrain.aerifal.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150222175146.GV32724@port70.net>
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 06:51:47PM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> * Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> [2015-02-21 22:24:53 -0500]:
> > When the cancellation state is set to MASKED, the first cancellation
> > point (other than close, which is special) called with cancellation
> > pending, or which has a cancellation request arrive while it's
> > blocking, returns with an error of ECANCELED, and sets the
> > cancellation state to DISABLE.
> >
> > Even code which was not specifically written to be cancellation-aware
> > is compatible with this behavior. As long as it is responding to
> > errors, it will see the error, but will have the full repertoire of
> > standard functions available to use while cleaning up and returning
> > after the error. If the error is ignored, cancellation will be
> > delayed, but the behavior is no worse than what could already happen
> > from ignoring errors.
>
> so it works like a special signal that only acts at blocking calls
And unlike portable signal-based approaches, it lacks the race
conditions and global state.
> since the thread is not forcefully killed, only notified about the
> cancellation, the cleanup mechanism is under the control of the
> programmer
>
> this seems like a relevant approach to c11 and c++11 which currently
> lack any way to safely cancel blocking threads
Yes.
> the only difficulty i see is that posix has a lot of cancellation
> points (some of which are optional) so code that wants to be
> 'masked cancellation safe' should properly do the error handling
> at a lot of places (eg some stdio functions like printf maybe
> cancellation points and usually not checked for errors directly
> only in aggregate through ferror)
>
> if i understood correctly code that does not want to immediately
> act upon masked cancellation (only at specific calls) should reset
> the cancellation state with
>
> pthread_setcancelstate(PTHREAD_CANCEL_MASKED, 0)
Library code would do this but with &old_cs rather than 0, then
restore the state before exiting. It it wants to actually behave like
a POSIX cancellation point, it would do something like:
pthread_setcancelstate(old_cs, 0)
if (was_canceled) {
pthread_testcancel();
pthread_setcancelstate(PTHREAD_CANCEL_DISABLE, 0);
}
Then, if old_cs was PTHREAD_CANCEL_ENABLE, the pthread_testcancel will
cause cancellation to be acted upon and the caller's cleanup handlers
to run. If old_cs was PTHREAD_CANCEL_MASKED, then pthread_testcancel
will do nothing and the subsequent call to set PTHREAD_CANCEL_DISABLE
will prevent further ECANCELED from happening (since your caller is
going to get its ECANCELED error from the function that's about to
return).
> and then cancellation is deferred until the next cancellation point.
>
> another issue is that pthread_testcancel() has no return value so it
> cannot be used for non-blocking testing of masked cancel.
Indeed, I noticed that. There are stupid ways to test but they're not
terribly efficient: lots of cancellation points have timeouts that can
be zero, but most of them are likely to result in a syscall if
cancellation is not already pending.
Rich
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-22 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-22 3:24 Rich Felker
2015-02-22 17:51 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2015-02-22 19:10 ` Rich Felker [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150222191000.GZ23507@brightrain.aerifal.cx \
--to=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=musl@lists.openwall.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/musl/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).