From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/7176
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Timo Teras <timo.teras@iki.fi>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: Does musl build error with gcc-4.9.2+ git repo resolved
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 08:23:50 +0200
Message-ID: <20150311082350.590d254e@vostro>
References: <20150311042235.GA4254@localhost>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1426055097 8749 80.91.229.3 (11 Mar 2015 06:24:57 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 06:24:57 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: musl@lists.openwall.com
To: vlse <vlse@veera.biz>
Original-X-From: musl-return-7189-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Wed Mar 11 07:24:51 2015
Return-path: <musl-return-7189-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-7189-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1YVa4Z-0005mI-Kw
	for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 07:24:51 +0100
Original-Received: (qmail 7725 invoked by uid 550); 11 Mar 2015 06:24:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 7689 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2015 06:24:45 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references
         :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=dDb8ByujlsW73zHyeb8wfg1YI8GkdX+N+RcOndW21Xk=;
        b=o2U4k7aaVYYay0EaTUS11LrX5GYoFef3NTERlLa18Vz0sIbt40kVkNqUcSYOJ9p0FA
         aeGR4j0f937tYKfrPQWUE4poZoYHPWZouo+V5TITyha81EZybew7cq2oNh3BV8JsRMdS
         vxMSRaDgQHHT5JwZ5tLpcOfqQ7pECDt0UnClZzZLGEWXAQypTEH4BVqKHh1n9QMoCGpZ
         LxSSnJQ7GIytytuGTgBl/q6X3dmXHPM38BA3jLZOeLiQI0bouEvxJehn1GTWPSqFMAWF
         X7dvV1IQRX9STOHQJpbio/3VHX/FfDG2SG7NhV5+WzWJp/ssUNx1j08k/Awat/WTzH7W
         +8Ug==
X-Received: by 10.112.157.100 with SMTP id wl4mr33642914lbb.108.1426055073808;
        Tue, 10 Mar 2015 23:24:33 -0700 (PDT)
Original-Sender: =?UTF-8?Q?Timo_Ter=C3=A4s?= <timo.teras@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150311042235.GA4254@localhost>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-alpine-linux-musl)
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:7176
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/7176>

On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 09:52:35 +0530
vlse <vlse@veera.biz> wrote:

> I want to know whether the gcc 4.9.x bug bugzilla id 61144 resolved
> with latest git/svn branch of gcc-4.9.x.
> 
> That bugzilla page says bug 61144 has been resolved. Anybody has
> confirmed it? Has musl changed it's build scripts to account that?

There was a workaround commit in musl for this earlier:
http://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/commit/?id=a6adb2bcd8145353943377d6119c1d7a4242bae1

This said, we've been running gcc 4.9.2 + musl on Alpine Linux edge for
a reasonable time with success. Then again, we mostly dynamic link, and
IIRC this bug affects only static linking.

/Timo