From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/7189 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rich Felker Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Re: musl 14x slower? Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 22:27:55 -0400 Message-ID: <20150314022754.GO23507@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1426300099 773 80.91.229.3 (14 Mar 2015 02:28:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 02:28:19 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-7202-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sat Mar 14 03:28:14 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YWboD-0005Lb-8t for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Mar 2015 03:28:13 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 20342 invoked by uid 550); 14 Mar 2015 02:28:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 20315 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2015 02:28:10 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Original-Sender: Rich Felker Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:7189 Archived-At: On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 04:26:10PM -0400, John Mudd wrote: > I think I found the cause. I added --enable-cassert Postgres option when > building Postgres with musl. This makes more sense. Have you tried rebuilding without that option? How does the speed of the resulting build compare? If it's still significantly slower (or faster? :) than the "native" (presumably glibc?) build it would be nice to know. Rich