From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/7409 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Szabolcs Nagy Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Explicit casts in ctype.h suppress compiler warnings Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 21:43:24 +0200 Message-ID: <20150417194323.GK2875@port70.net> References: <1429289394.7038.3.camel@inria.fr> <20150417165238.GA6817@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20150417183511.GJ2875@port70.net> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1429299825 7839 80.91.229.3 (17 Apr 2015 19:43:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 19:43:45 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-7422-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Fri Apr 17 21:43:39 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YjCAs-0005lz-DD for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 21:43:38 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 15496 invoked by uid 550); 17 Apr 2015 19:43:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 15475 invoked from network); 17 Apr 2015 19:43:36 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150417183511.GJ2875@port70.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:7409 Archived-At: * Szabolcs Nagy [2015-04-17 20:35:12 +0200]: > > I admit I was thinking of doing isspace-style inlines everywhere, but thanks > > to your suggestion I was able to come up with this: > > > > static __inline void __is_int(int a) {} > > #define isdigit(a) (__is_int(0?(a):0), ((unsigned)(a)-'0') < 10) > > > > i think using :0 there is not useful because null > pointer constants are special in ?: > ah i see what you are doing there now meanwhile i tested that (__extension__ (unsigned){a}) is accepted without warning in c89 mode