From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/7410 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rich Felker Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Explicit casts in ctype.h suppress compiler warnings Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 16:21:26 -0400 Message-ID: <20150417202126.GD6817@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: <1429289394.7038.3.camel@inria.fr> <20150417165238.GA6817@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20150417183511.GJ2875@port70.net> <20150417194323.GK2875@port70.net> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1429302104 12226 80.91.229.3 (17 Apr 2015 20:21:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 20:21:44 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-7423-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Fri Apr 17 22:21:44 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YjClg-0000rC-T8 for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 22:21:41 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 3424 invoked by uid 550); 17 Apr 2015 20:21:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 3406 invoked from network); 17 Apr 2015 20:21:38 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150417194323.GK2875@port70.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Original-Sender: Rich Felker Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:7410 Archived-At: On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 09:43:24PM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > * Szabolcs Nagy [2015-04-17 20:35:12 +0200]: > > > I admit I was thinking of doing isspace-style inlines everywhere, but thanks > > > to your suggestion I was able to come up with this: > > > > > > static __inline void __is_int(int a) {} > > > #define isdigit(a) (__is_int(0?(a):0), ((unsigned)(a)-'0') < 10) > > > > > > > i think using :0 there is not useful because null > > pointer constants are special in ?: > > > > ah i see what you are doing there now Yes, this is exactly the type of thing I hoped could be done. > meanwhile i tested that (__extension__ (unsigned){a}) > is accepted without warning in c89 mode Try again with -pedantic. Rich