From: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use CAS instead of atomic swap to implement spinlock
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 02:01:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150419060132.GN6817@brightrain.aerifal.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.11.1504190847320.11963@monopod.intra.ispras.ru>
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 08:50:18AM +0300, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Apr 2015, Rich Felker wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 01:44:53AM +0300, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> > > This should allow spinning without constantly dirtying cache lines holding the
> > > spinlock value. On architectures without native atomic swap, musl implement
> > > a_swap by looping around a_cas.
> > > ---
> > > If I'm not mistaken this was also suggested by nsz on IRC.
> > >
> > > src/thread/pthread_spin_lock.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/src/thread/pthread_spin_lock.c b/src/thread/pthread_spin_lock.c
> > > index df575f0..dabcb31 100644
> > > --- a/src/thread/pthread_spin_lock.c
> > > +++ b/src/thread/pthread_spin_lock.c
> > > @@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
> > >
> > > int pthread_spin_lock(pthread_spinlock_t *s)
> > > {
> > > - while (a_swap(s, 1)) a_spin();
> > > + while (a_cas(s, 0, 1)) a_spin();
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> >
> > Would it perhaps be better to do something like this?
> >
> > while (*(volatile int *)s || a_cas(s, 0, 1)) a_spin();
>
> I think so, Yes. Is the cast required, or is it possible to change the
> pthread_spinlock_t typedef to 'volatile int'?
For C++ ABI purposes, I think switching to volatile int would be a
different type. :(
I wouldn't really be opposed to changing it for C and just having the
ABI-compat type used when __cplusplus is defined. We already do that
for pthread_t.
Rich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-19 6:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-14 22:44 Alexander Monakov
2015-04-14 23:16 ` Rich Felker
2015-04-15 6:29 ` Concerns about dlclose() behaviour Brad Conroy
2015-04-15 7:17 ` Rich Felker
2015-04-19 0:24 ` [PATCH] Use CAS instead of atomic swap to implement spinlock Rich Felker
2015-04-19 5:50 ` Alexander Monakov
2015-04-19 6:01 ` Rich Felker [this message]
2015-04-19 12:46 ` Szabolcs Nagy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150419060132.GN6817@brightrain.aerifal.cx \
--to=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=musl@lists.openwall.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/musl/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).