From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/7585 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Szabolcs Nagy Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: There is no tests for musl, Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 10:01:24 +0200 Message-ID: <20150508080122.GC29035@port70.net> References: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1431072102 27410 80.91.229.3 (8 May 2015 08:01:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 08:01:42 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-7598-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Fri May 08 10:01:37 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YqdE1-00034z-Nh for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 May 2015 10:01:37 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 32267 invoked by uid 550); 8 May 2015 08:01:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 32249 invoked from network); 8 May 2015 08:01:36 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:7585 Archived-At: * ?????????(Yonggang Luo) [2015-05-08 15:38:33 +0800]: > That's really not so good for the stable. > it is a good thing a libc should provide portable semantics so implementation independent tests should be used not "tests for musl" http://wiki.musl-libc.org/wiki/Libc-Test