From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/7671 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Felix Janda Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: ppc soft-float regression Date: Sun, 17 May 2015 21:56:23 +0200 Message-ID: <20150517195622.GA4761@euler> References: <20150517080321.GL16123@waldemar-brodkorb.de> <20150517100218.GA2754@euler> <20150517163723.GP17573@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20150517175021.GA2171@euler> <20150517181556.GA23050@euler> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1431892613 962 80.91.229.3 (17 May 2015 19:56:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 17 May 2015 19:56:53 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-7683-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sun May 17 21:56:53 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yu4g7-0000GC-Ad for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 May 2015 21:56:51 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 18076 invoked by uid 550); 17 May 2015 19:56:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 18058 invoked from network); 17 May 2015 19:56:49 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150517181556.GA23050@euler> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:7671 Archived-At: Felix Janda wrote: > Felix Janda wrote: > > Rich Felker wrote: > > > On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 12:02:19PM +0200, Felix Janda wrote: > > [..] > > > > segfaults. git bisect says > > > > > > > > # first bad commit: [f3ddd173806fd5c60b3f034528ca24542aecc5b9] dynamic linker bootstrap overhaul > > > > > > Did you observe a regression here yourself, or just with Waldemar's > > > binaries which you said were broken? If you think this commit really > > > caused regressions on ppc I'll look into it but I don't want to waste > > > time doing that if it's not broken. > > > > The commit is just the point where Waldemar's binary stopped working. > > So not really a bug in musl. > > Actually, in my test ppc chroot bash (and more generally programs linked > against ncurses) starts segfaulting (with a null-pointer access) after > upgrading to musl-1.1.9. The program #define _GNU_SOURCE #include int main(void) { return program_invocation_short_name[0]; } starts segfaulting with the above commit. Felix