From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/7726 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Szabolcs Nagy Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] Build process uses script to add CFI directives to x86 asm Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 20:07:52 +0200 Message-ID: <20150520180752.GJ11258@port70.net> References: <20150520170819.GA24879@alex-ThinkPad-L530> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1432145293 28920 80.91.229.3 (20 May 2015 18:08:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 18:08:13 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-7738-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Wed May 20 20:08:06 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yv8PW-00025W-0a for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 May 2015 20:08:06 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 3502 invoked by uid 550); 20 May 2015 18:08:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 3484 invoked from network); 20 May 2015 18:08:03 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150520170819.GA24879@alex-ThinkPad-L530> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:7726 Archived-At: * Alex Dowad [2015-05-20 19:08:19 +0200]: > > Maintainers: is there still anything blocking this patch from getting merged > in? Please let me know so I can fix any remaining problems. > all your mails start a new thread because they don't have the In-Reply-To: header set up properly (at least that's how they appear to me) so it's hard to follow the current state.. i think there are issues - as wrapping (we did not yet agree about the cleanest way) - %.sub rules are not yet handled - i think the \s \w should be fixed (at least mawk gets them wrong) - clang otherwise it should be ok (build system changes are always painful)