From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/7872 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rich Felker Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Revisiting byte-based C locale Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 16:53:32 -0400 Message-ID: <20150604205332.GS17573@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: <20150522022203.GA26651@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1433451246 22245 80.91.229.3 (4 Jun 2015 20:54:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 20:54:06 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-7885-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Thu Jun 04 22:54:03 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0c96-0000JO-Bd for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 22:53:48 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 24233 invoked by uid 550); 4 Jun 2015 20:53:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 24215 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2015 20:53:45 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150522022203.GA26651@brightrain.aerifal.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Original-Sender: Rich Felker Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:7872 Archived-At: On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:22:03PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > Any new opinions on the topic? Or interest in re-emphasizing a > previously stated opinion? :) No new opinions on this? I've tentatively added drafting a new proposed byte-based C locale patch as a roadmap item for this release cycle, not necessarily to commit it, but as a way to re-evaluate whether it's still costly to implement. Rich