From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/7875 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Isaac Dunham Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Revisiting byte-based C locale Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 21:48:28 -0700 Message-ID: <20150605044827.GA1826@localhost> References: <20150522022203.GA26651@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20150604205332.GS17573@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <87eglrchph.fsf@gmail.com> <20150605013911.GT17573@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1433479717 12967 80.91.229.3 (5 Jun 2015 04:48:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 04:48:37 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-7888-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Fri Jun 05 06:48:37 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0jYW-0001J6-4I for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 06:48:32 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 26029 invoked by uid 550); 5 Jun 2015 04:48:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 26011 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2015 04:48:29 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Ik1ZWQX3z1/x+DOyC7DJPeHgnHfOvpAWgZzVKZqHqZg=; b=0eqPWCJCZ9NMaQFtGYU5WY5GTz8tIyK+n0epdlnirhd6uqPMwSOsSQEXWX+Jn+UgSE sWxd16WgGYYeo2F3XOZicgBNBxLeE7ilMvuzePfCLIwhGZuGDS0472je2Owlgvfqmbfo FIi3pn5JHkE0hxuaBTjXw9lULjez0ybvKeeRlh9ehH2JqW/M8TWKGMLw3L/aYZemhbmV zxmImsnzm5JSQdSwGxEHrNNrANfJ6s5QiAgv96b8ZEpNfak4rTLc+C2m/f+IT9X4HQAG QjprHAbJINV3QYApJXToh39RGpTVV8IW8XvAlQpv0SU7VW1OiTkZzORl3L1Qb7jS8/Ov 2Elw== X-Received: by 10.140.133.199 with SMTP id 190mr1938011qhf.17.1433479698097; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 21:48:18 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150605013911.GT17573@brightrain.aerifal.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:7875 Archived-At: On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 09:39:11PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 11:00:10PM +0200, Christian Neukirchen wrote: > > Rich Felker writes: > > > > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:22:03PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > > >> Any new opinions on the topic? Or interest in re-emphasizing a > > >> previously stated opinion? :) > > > > > > No new opinions on this? I've tentatively added drafting a new > > > proposed byte-based C locale patch as a roadmap item for this release > > > cycle, not necessarily to commit it, but as a way to re-evaluate > > > whether it's still costly to implement. > > > > Will it support regexec on 8-bit binary data? > > Yes, as long as the program has done one of the following: > > - Not called setlocale at all. > - Called setlocale with an explicit "C" argument or in environment. > - Called uselocale with a locale_t for "C". I'd like to see it happen, and those conditions are reasonable. Thanks, Isaac Dunham