From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/7891 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rich Felker Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: musl 1.1.10 uselocale regression, patch Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2015 12:31:40 -0400 Message-ID: <20150606163140.GY17573@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: <20150605162626.GA20452@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <55731577.1010205@opensource.dyc.edu> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1433608332 11044 80.91.229.3 (6 Jun 2015 16:32:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2015 16:32:12 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-7904-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sat Jun 06 18:32:00 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Z1H0k-0008Ff-Sa for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2015 18:31:55 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 24180 invoked by uid 550); 6 Jun 2015 16:31:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 24162 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2015 16:31:53 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55731577.1010205@opensource.dyc.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Original-Sender: Rich Felker Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:7891 Archived-At: On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 11:44:55AM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > On 6/5/15 12:26 PM, Rich Felker wrote: > >A new regression in uselocale made it into musl 1.1.10. All users > >should apply the attached patch. > > I'm skipping 1.1.9 for all the gentoo stages (mostly because the > mips bug was a show stopper). I can backport this patch, but is > there a new release on the horizon given that this is a significant > bug? I'm not planning to insert another release cycle to deal with it. If users are unhappy with having to download and apply the patch separately, I might make (and sign) a 1.1.10a tarball for convenience. Let me know if that's something you want to see happen. Rich