From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/8459 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: u-wsnj@aetey.se Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Rejected feature requests Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2015 12:09:36 +0200 Message-ID: <20150905100936.GL11263@example.net> References: <20150905015350.GA28284@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1441447824 5374 80.91.229.3 (5 Sep 2015 10:10:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2015 10:10:24 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-8471-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sat Sep 05 12:10:09 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZYAQB-0000Yo-V3 for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2015 12:10:08 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 22243 invoked by uid 550); 5 Sep 2015 10:10:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 22224 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2015 10:10:05 -0000 X-T2-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 Received-SPF: none receiver=mailfe03.swip.net; client-ip=185.62.188.247; envelope-from=u-wsnj@aetey.se Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150905015350.GA28284@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:8459 Archived-At: On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 09:53:50PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > Christian Neukirchen pointed out to me this page GNU coreutils has: > > http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/rejected_requests.html > > and it struck me as something that would be really useful to have for > musl: a list of requested features/changes/etc. that have been > discussed before and rejected or put on indefinite hold, with links to > mailing list threads, to point people to when the topic comes up > again. We could also make a link to (or full text copy of) the general > criteria for including/excluding nonstandard interfaces, which have > also been discussed on the list in the past. +1 Rune