From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/8634
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: u-uy74@aetey.se
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: musl bug or not, real or not? (Was: [musl] Update: [musl]
 pthread_getattr_np() vs explicit runtime) loader
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 12:59:31 +0200
Message-ID: <20151007105931.GT28311@example.net>
References: <20150920172237.GR12087@example.net>
 <20150920182728.GM17773@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <20150920193033.GS12087@example.net>
 <20150920194132.GO17773@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <20150930154337.GC13149@example.net>
 <20150930203548.GF13149@example.net>
 <20151006113451.GI28311@example.net>
 <20151006170755.GQ8645@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <20151007072753.GM28311@example.net>
 <20151007104339.54a05f90@vostro>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1444215617 5294 80.91.229.3 (7 Oct 2015 11:00:17 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 11:00:17 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-8646-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Wed Oct 07 13:00:11 2015
Return-path: <musl-return-8646-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-8646-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1ZjmS9-0004Rr-OM
	for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2015 13:00:09 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 27807 invoked by uid 550); 7 Oct 2015 11:00:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 27787 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2015 11:00:00 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=fripost.org; h=
	in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type:content-type
	:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:subject:from:from
	:date:date; s=20140703; t=1444215589; x=1446029990; bh=TXG4yhrPD
	+pMVMPBQ6qFSCuFlewo9oijrrRI91gM0ls=; b=kQPUSXI6ZwNdZdqWC6A+62a7v
	KjWhiSJEkKSptK/YU0GAJgODiAG0I6Rc6lolcipQfFL/thD5Z8331LtabVadTaJC
	+ByUrxuj1um/l7QYXONIz9Rxa3IOuGosmeMKOlq7nnmKXMtRApyIr8wCsjYhvlOh
	JcrDYXYg2q9b7sOs/8=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at fripost.org
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20151007104339.54a05f90@vostro>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:8634
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/8634>

On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 10:43:39AM +0300, Timo Teras wrote:
> gcj uses boehm-gc. Alpine has patches for gcc boehm-gc. We are also
> patching gcc's gcj. You can see our full patch set at:
> http://git.alpinelinux.org/cgit/aports/tree/main/gcc

I see now.

My musl-related tweaks to boehm-gc were insufficient,
missing the ones for
 boehm-gc/dyn_load.c
 boehm-gc/include/private/gcconfig.h

Testing with these fixes applied...
... 3 hours later the build is ready.

Now it does not crash (of course) in any situation where I test.

> Some of these may or may not fix the issue you have at had. Not sure
> how your gcc/gcj is built.

Thanks a lot Timo!

I overestimated the compatibility of gcc-5.2 with musl.

Apologies for unfounded doubts of musl correctness.

Rune