From: Kurt H Maier <khm@sdf.org>
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Re: Would love to see reconsideration for domain and search
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 17:57:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151024215710.GA8084@wopr.sciops.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAO_RewYQWuOUwKVNjX_j_S2-khuP9Z7XRZGcff=XKZXvoBtzeg@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 02:33:31PM -0700, Tim Hockin wrote:
> Where is the standard that defines ordering semantics in resolv.conf?
There isn't one, but that doesn't mean you get to ensconce the behavior
you like. That was my point.
> Search has to be ordered. You can not possibly argue otherwise?
I can and do.
> I am arguing for adding a very standard feature (search) to open musl to a
> whole new space of users.
You're not arguing for simple inclusion of search; you're arguing for
specific behavior that is impossible to implement in a sane manner,
because that's how glibc does it. I am not against domain and search,
but I don't just want functionality poorly added just to check some box
on a random other project's wishlist.
> Nobody is forcing you to use search paths or ndots.
Not sure how this is relevant? Nobody's forcing anyone to do anything.
What is your point?
khm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-24 21:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-22 21:24 Tim Hockin
2015-10-22 21:56 ` Rich Felker
2015-10-22 22:36 ` Tim Hockin
2015-10-22 23:00 ` Josiah Worcester
2015-10-22 23:37 ` Tim Hockin
2015-10-23 4:27 ` Rich Felker
2015-10-23 5:13 ` Tim Hockin
2015-10-23 5:31 ` Rich Felker
2015-10-23 5:37 ` Tim Hockin
2015-10-23 6:00 ` Rich Felker
2015-10-23 6:04 ` Tim Hockin
2016-01-29 0:57 ` Rich Felker
2015-10-27 0:30 ` Rich Felker
2015-10-27 0:37 ` Tim Hockin
2015-10-27 0:45 ` Rich Felker
2015-10-27 8:11 ` u-uy74
2015-11-28 22:48 ` Jan Broer
2015-11-28 23:20 ` Rich Felker
2015-11-29 3:06 ` Jan Broer
2016-01-29 0:58 ` Rich Felker
2015-10-26 2:14 ` Re: Would not " John Levine
2015-10-26 5:14 ` Tim Hockin
2015-10-26 16:16 ` Rich Felker
2015-10-26 17:41 ` John Levine
2015-10-26 18:08 ` Rich Felker
2015-10-23 8:12 ` Re: Would " u-uy74
2015-10-23 9:35 ` Laurent Bercot
2015-10-23 12:23 ` Laurent Bercot
2015-10-23 15:57 ` Tim Hockin
2015-10-23 5:26 ` Kurt H Maier
2015-10-24 21:33 ` Tim Hockin
2015-10-24 21:57 ` Kurt H Maier [this message]
2015-10-24 23:31 ` Rich Felker
2015-10-24 22:02 ` Rich Felker
2015-10-24 22:32 ` Tim Hockin
2015-10-25 8:20 ` u-uy74
2015-10-25 13:06 ` Jan Broer
2015-10-25 13:19 ` u-uy74
2015-10-25 13:39 ` Jan Broer
2015-10-25 14:08 ` u-uy74
2015-10-25 19:08 ` Rich Felker
2015-10-26 1:26 ` Isaac Dunham
2015-10-26 15:35 ` Rich Felker
2015-10-23 15:30 Jan Broer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151024215710.GA8084@wopr.sciops.net \
--to=khm@sdf.org \
--cc=musl@lists.openwall.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/musl/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).