From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/8766 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kurt H Maier Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Re: Would love to see reconsideration for domain and search Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 17:57:10 -0400 Message-ID: <20151024215710.GA8084@wopr.sciops.net> References: <20151023052625.GD55813@wopr.sciops.net> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1445728469 1792 80.91.229.3 (24 Oct 2015 23:14:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 23:14:29 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-8779-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sun Oct 25 01:14:29 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zq812-0002GJ-Ch for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2015 01:14:24 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 19697 invoked by uid 550); 24 Oct 2015 23:14:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 7267 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2015 21:57:24 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: wopr.sciops.net: khm set sender to khm@sdf.org using -f Mail-Followup-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:8766 Archived-At: On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 02:33:31PM -0700, Tim Hockin wrote: > Where is the standard that defines ordering semantics in resolv.conf? There isn't one, but that doesn't mean you get to ensconce the behavior you like. That was my point. > Search has to be ordered. You can not possibly argue otherwise? I can and do. > I am arguing for adding a very standard feature (search) to open musl to a > whole new space of users. You're not arguing for simple inclusion of search; you're arguing for specific behavior that is impossible to implement in a sane manner, because that's how glibc does it. I am not against domain and search, but I don't just want functionality poorly added just to check some box on a random other project's wishlist. > Nobody is forcing you to use search paths or ndots. Not sure how this is relevant? Nobody's forcing anyone to do anything. What is your point? khm