From: u-uy74@aetey.se
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Re: Would love to see reconsideration for domain and search
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 15:08:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151025140831.GK28311@example.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+MmhbNmqs2U7UqpfKjgPXO48J_UCEXfitbFaD_rRVpqwsrNFQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 02:39:36PM +0100, Jan Broer wrote:
> I don't think we disagree there. The user decides whether search is used by
> either setting the search keyword in resolv.conf or by configuring his DHCP
> client (dhclient.conf) to fetch the domain-search option from the DHCP
> server.
You seem to assume that the user can not influence the ndots option in the
resolv.conf if the corresponding host is to use some other data delivered
by dhcp (i.e. for building resolv.conf).
For certain setups this can be true, probably meaning that they [rely
on a non-existent standard and] do not bother having proper control
over resolv.conf?
Otherwise, in a general case, we disagree.
Isn't it reasonable that people wishing to use extra and
"somewhat/potentially expensive" features of resolv.conf have to put
effort into actually activating them?
Regards,
Rune
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-25 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-22 21:24 Tim Hockin
2015-10-22 21:56 ` Rich Felker
2015-10-22 22:36 ` Tim Hockin
2015-10-22 23:00 ` Josiah Worcester
2015-10-22 23:37 ` Tim Hockin
2015-10-23 4:27 ` Rich Felker
2015-10-23 5:13 ` Tim Hockin
2015-10-23 5:31 ` Rich Felker
2015-10-23 5:37 ` Tim Hockin
2015-10-23 6:00 ` Rich Felker
2015-10-23 6:04 ` Tim Hockin
2016-01-29 0:57 ` Rich Felker
2015-10-27 0:30 ` Rich Felker
2015-10-27 0:37 ` Tim Hockin
2015-10-27 0:45 ` Rich Felker
2015-10-27 8:11 ` u-uy74
2015-11-28 22:48 ` Jan Broer
2015-11-28 23:20 ` Rich Felker
2015-11-29 3:06 ` Jan Broer
2016-01-29 0:58 ` Rich Felker
2015-10-26 2:14 ` Re: Would not " John Levine
2015-10-26 5:14 ` Tim Hockin
2015-10-26 16:16 ` Rich Felker
2015-10-26 17:41 ` John Levine
2015-10-26 18:08 ` Rich Felker
2015-10-23 8:12 ` Re: Would " u-uy74
2015-10-23 9:35 ` Laurent Bercot
2015-10-23 12:23 ` Laurent Bercot
2015-10-23 15:57 ` Tim Hockin
2015-10-23 5:26 ` Kurt H Maier
2015-10-24 21:33 ` Tim Hockin
2015-10-24 21:57 ` Kurt H Maier
2015-10-24 23:31 ` Rich Felker
2015-10-24 22:02 ` Rich Felker
2015-10-24 22:32 ` Tim Hockin
2015-10-25 8:20 ` u-uy74
2015-10-25 13:06 ` Jan Broer
2015-10-25 13:19 ` u-uy74
2015-10-25 13:39 ` Jan Broer
2015-10-25 14:08 ` u-uy74 [this message]
2015-10-25 19:08 ` Rich Felker
2015-10-26 1:26 ` Isaac Dunham
2015-10-26 15:35 ` Rich Felker
2015-10-23 15:30 Jan Broer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151025140831.GK28311@example.net \
--to=u-uy74@aetey.se \
--cc=musl@lists.openwall.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/musl/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).