mailing list of musl libc
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Re: Would love to see reconsideration for domain and search
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 20:45:50 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151027004550.GQ8645@brightrain.aerifal.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAO_RewZ4aWOdd6SZMDsFxYijJoThsE7FSVHxgCCauH1JriQ3Yw@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 05:37:20PM -0700, Tim Hockin wrote:
> wrt 2) my understanding is that you get at-most-one-of `search` or `domain`.

Ah, yes, it's lower in the man page after the list of options:

       The domain and search keywords are mutually exclusive.  If more than
       one instance of these keywords is present, the last instance wins.

I see no reason to do differently than glibc (and legacy resolvers)
does here; that would just be gratuitous difference for applications
to deal with.

Rich


  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-27  0:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-22 21:24 Tim Hockin
2015-10-22 21:56 ` Rich Felker
2015-10-22 22:36   ` Tim Hockin
2015-10-22 23:00     ` Josiah Worcester
2015-10-22 23:37       ` Tim Hockin
2015-10-23  4:27         ` Rich Felker
2015-10-23  5:13           ` Tim Hockin
2015-10-23  5:31             ` Rich Felker
2015-10-23  5:37               ` Tim Hockin
2015-10-23  6:00                 ` Rich Felker
2015-10-23  6:04                   ` Tim Hockin
2016-01-29  0:57                 ` Rich Felker
2015-10-27  0:30               ` Rich Felker
2015-10-27  0:37                 ` Tim Hockin
2015-10-27  0:45                   ` Rich Felker [this message]
2015-10-27  8:11                 ` u-uy74
2015-11-28 22:48                 ` Jan Broer
2015-11-28 23:20                   ` Rich Felker
2015-11-29  3:06                     ` Jan Broer
2016-01-29  0:58                   ` Rich Felker
2015-10-26  2:14           ` Re: Would not " John Levine
2015-10-26  5:14             ` Tim Hockin
2015-10-26 16:16               ` Rich Felker
2015-10-26 17:41                 ` John Levine
2015-10-26 18:08                   ` Rich Felker
2015-10-23  8:12       ` Re: Would " u-uy74
2015-10-23  9:35         ` Laurent Bercot
2015-10-23 12:23           ` Laurent Bercot
2015-10-23 15:57           ` Tim Hockin
2015-10-23  5:26 ` Kurt H Maier
2015-10-24 21:33   ` Tim Hockin
2015-10-24 21:57     ` Kurt H Maier
2015-10-24 23:31       ` Rich Felker
2015-10-24 22:02     ` Rich Felker
2015-10-24 22:32       ` Tim Hockin
2015-10-25  8:20       ` u-uy74
2015-10-25 13:06       ` Jan Broer
2015-10-25 13:19         ` u-uy74
2015-10-25 13:39           ` Jan Broer
2015-10-25 14:08             ` u-uy74
2015-10-25 19:08         ` Rich Felker
2015-10-26  1:26       ` Isaac Dunham
2015-10-26 15:35         ` Rich Felker
2015-10-23 15:30 Jan Broer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151027004550.GQ8645@brightrain.aerifal.cx \
    --to=dalias@libc.org \
    --cc=musl@lists.openwall.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/musl/

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).