From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/8788 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rich Felker Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Re: Would love to see reconsideration for domain and search Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 20:45:50 -0400 Message-ID: <20151027004550.GQ8645@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: <20151022215608.GA8645@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20151023042720.GE8645@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20151023053108.GG8645@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20151027003021.GN8645@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1445906772 4453 80.91.229.3 (27 Oct 2015 00:46:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 00:46:12 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-8801-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Tue Oct 27 01:46:07 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZqsOs-0003Ut-KD for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 01:46:06 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 28307 invoked by uid 550); 27 Oct 2015 00:46:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 28285 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2015 00:46:03 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Original-Sender: Rich Felker Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:8788 Archived-At: On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 05:37:20PM -0700, Tim Hockin wrote: > wrt 2) my understanding is that you get at-most-one-of `search` or `domain`. Ah, yes, it's lower in the man page after the list of options: The domain and search keywords are mutually exclusive. If more than one instance of these keywords is present, the last instance wins. I see no reason to do differently than glibc (and legacy resolvers) does here; that would just be gratuitous difference for applications to deal with. Rich