From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/8834 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?0KDRi9GB0Yw=?= Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: sys/io.h lacks inb_p and outb_p on x86 Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:29:31 +0700 Message-ID: <20151110162931.1944693c@r2lynx> References: <20151108112655.4ad63277@r2lynx> <20151108045045.GM3818@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20151108121337.7114adab@r2lynx> <20151108052358.GN3818@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20151109221734.GR3818@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20151110150818.5820b37d@r2lynx> <20151110085052.GA332@nyan> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447147613 19325 80.91.229.3 (10 Nov 2015 09:26:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 09:26:53 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-8847-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Tue Nov 10 10:26:53 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zw5CW-0002zK-1P for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 10:26:52 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 25951 invoked by uid 550); 10 Nov 2015 09:26:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 25933 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2015 09:26:48 -0000 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 In-Reply-To: <20151110085052.GA332@nyan> X-Mailer: claws Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:8834 Archived-At: On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 09:50:52 +0100 Felix Janda wrote: > =D0=A0=D1=8B=D1=81=D1=8C wrote: > [..] > >=20 > > So, after three+ years of experience with musl I just hit this once, > > and I don't think they worth adding if there is no much interest. > >=20 > > memtest86+ uses no libc code, and suddenly only grabs those two from > > host which is easily patchable. >=20 > It also has an "io.h" which should define inb_p and outb_p via some > "misuse" of macros. Can't it use that instead of ? >=20 > Felix OK the build is fixable with -DSLOW_IO_BY_JUMPING. I thought it's io.h did not used in it. Sorry for the noise then. --=20 http://lynxlynx.tk/ Power electronics made simple Unix and simple KISS C code