From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/9455
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: Re: Clang static analyser results
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 14:21:00 -0500
Message-ID: <20160303192100.GX9349@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
References: <1A7CA8D6-05F7-4FF6-A2FD-55AE8DA356AE@gmail.com>
 <F9C39216-84B7-4B65-B692-37521E62BBFB@gmail.com>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1457032889 18269 80.91.229.3 (3 Mar 2016 19:21:29 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 19:21:29 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-9468-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Thu Mar 03 20:21:21 2016
Return-path: <musl-return-9468-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-9468-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1abYoF-0005Js-8O
	for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 20:21:15 +0100
Original-Received: (qmail 1662 invoked by uid 550); 3 Mar 2016 19:21:13 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-ID: <musl.lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 1627 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2016 19:21:12 -0000
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <F9C39216-84B7-4B65-B692-37521E62BBFB@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Original-Sender: Rich Felker <dalias@aerifal.cx>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:9455
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/9455>

On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 10:56:33PM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> 
> > On Mar 2, 2016, at 10:32 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > All,
> > 
> > I ran clang static analyser on tip of git today for x86_64 build. The results are here

Thanks!

> > https://busybox.net/~kraj/scan-build-2016-03-02-222206-32091-1/
> 
> and
> 
> https://busybox.net/~kraj/scan-build-2016-03-02-225259-30448-1/
> 
> is arm cross built with clang as CC

Any idea why the results are different for arm? Most of the code where
things are reported does not differ by arch.

I think everything reported has been investigated before and found to
be false positives. Do any of them look new/interesting?

Rich