From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/9678 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rich Felker Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Add support for amd64 target Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 23:46:23 -0400 Message-ID: <20160318034622.GM21636@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: <20160318023341.GB71208@thinkpad.swarthmore.edu> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1458272801 1736 80.91.229.3 (18 Mar 2016 03:46:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 03:46:41 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-9691-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Fri Mar 18 04:46:40 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aglN0-0007MB-Pd for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 04:46:38 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 21984 invoked by uid 550); 18 Mar 2016 03:46:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Original-Received: (qmail 21964 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2016 03:46:36 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160318023341.GB71208@thinkpad.swarthmore.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Original-Sender: Rich Felker Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:9678 Archived-At: On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 10:33:41PM -0400, Michael McConville wrote: > AMD64 and x86-64 are effectively interchangeable terms. BSDs use the > prior while Linux uses the latter. The below patch therefore fixes > configure on OpenBSD. I'm not opposed to adding this if you think it will help, but I'm skeptical of whether a toolchain targeting OpenBSD can produce a working musl build anyway. Are you trying to get something that runs on OpenBSD or use the OpenBSD compiler as a makeshift cross compiler to get a normal Linux build? > For what it's worth, the build then survives until linking. I haven't > had a chance to diagnose that problem yet. What are the linker errors you hit? It's not surprising that compiling would work since no files external to the musl source tree are accessed during compiling, but linking could bring in lots of issues, and runtime even more. Rich