From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/9693 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rich Felker Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: musl licensing Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 14:07:41 -0400 Message-ID: <20160318180741.GP21636@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: <56E98AB1.9030309@openwall.com> <20160316234656.GQ9349@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20160317081748.GF13856@example.net> <20160317160131.GE21636@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20160318042158.GN21636@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1458324480 17617 80.91.229.3 (18 Mar 2016 18:08:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 18:08:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: musl@lists.openwall.com To: Christopher Lane Original-X-From: musl-return-9706-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Fri Mar 18 19:08:00 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1agyoZ-0000pa-JG for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 19:07:59 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 30031 invoked by uid 550); 18 Mar 2016 18:07:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Original-Received: (qmail 29994 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2016 18:07:56 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Original-Sender: Rich Felker Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:9693 Archived-At: On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 09:47:09PM -0700, Christopher Lane wrote: > > I'll contact all significant contributors to crt files and public > > headers (this will mostly be port contributors, for the arch/bits/*.h > > files, but does Google even want/need these for their use or will they > > be providing their own?) and: > > There are some architectures we don't need, so we can prune the list a bit > for sure. Tomorrow we can send you a list of all the files we care about > that are claimed to be PD. I'll try to take care of them all anyway for the sake of future users who might have your same problem. The reason I wondered if you need any of these, though, is that the bits files are basically all for the sake of interfacing with Linux syscalls. They're wanted/needed for a libc that runs directly on Linux but I don't know if you'd want to use them at all for something like NaCl or if it has its own mediation layer with its own ABI (in which case you'd provide your own versions to match that ABI). > Overall I'm pleased with your proposal. I'm optimistic that'll work, but I > should be able to find out for sure tomorrow. Great. Rich