mailing list of musl libc
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
To: Jaydeep Patil <Jaydeep.Patil@imgtec.com>
Cc: "musl@lists.openwall.com" <musl@lists.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix atomic_arch.h for MIPS32 R6
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 00:10:56 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160329041055.GL21636@brightrain.aerifal.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BD7773622145634B952E5B54ACA8E349AA24BD1A@PUMAIL01.pu.imgtec.org>

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 03:54:02AM +0000, Jaydeep Patil wrote:
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Rich Felker [mailto:dalias@aerifal.cx] On Behalf Of Rich Felker
> >Sent: 28 March 2016 PM 06:35
> >To: Jaydeep Patil
> >Cc: musl@lists.openwall.com
> >Subject: Re: [musl] [PATCH] Fix atomic_arch.h for MIPS32 R6
> >
> >On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 05:07:39AM +0000, Jaydeep Patil wrote:
> >> >> >I was just saying it makes the code less cluttered to use them
> >> >> >spuriously even though we don't need to:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >		".set push ; "
> >> >> >#if __mips_isa_rev < 6
> >> >> >		".set mips2 ; "
> >> >> >#endif
> >> >> >		"ll %0, %1 ; .set pop"
> >> >> >
> >> >> >or similar.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >It's also not clear to me whether the "m" constraint is valid
> >> >> >anymore for the R6 ll/sc instructions since they take a 9-bit
> >> >> >offset now instead of a
> >> >16-bit offset.
> >> >> >The compiler could generate an address expression whose offset
> >> >> >part does not fit in 9 bits. In that case we may need to #if the
> >> >> >whole function (or at least the __asm__ statement) separately
> >> >> >rather than just
> >> >skipping the .set mips2....
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> The "m" constrain is still valid here, as the offset will be 0 in this case..
> >> >
> >> >How can you assume the offset will be 0? It's the compiler's choice
> >> >what to use. For instance, a_cas(&foo->bar, t, s) is likely to have
> >> >an offset equal to offsetof(__typeof__(foo),bar). AFAIK this happens
> >> >in practice with small offsets in mutex structures, etc. so the bug
> >> >may be unlikely to be hit, but I think it's still an incorrect-constraint bug.
> >>
> >> Compiler generates appropriate LL/SC based on the offset.
> >> Compiler adds the offset to the base register if it does not fit 9bits.
> >
> >The compiler has no way of knowing that the operand will be used with ll with
> >the 9-bit offset restriction; as far as it knows, it will be used in a normal
> >context where a 16-bit offset is valid. I don't have a toolchain that will target
> >r6, but you can try the following program which produces an offset of 4096 for
> >loading p[1024]:
> >
> >unsigned ll1k(volatile unsigned *p)
> >{
> >	unsigned val;
> >	__asm__ __volatile__ ("ll %0, %1" : "=r"(val) : "m"(p[1024]) :
> >"memory" );
> >	return val;
> >}
> >
> >I would expect this to produce errors at assembly time on r6.
> >Rich
> 
> This is what compiler has generated for above function:
> 
> $ gcc -c -o main.o main.c -O3 -mips32r6 -mabi=32
> 
> Objdump:
> 
> 00000000 <ll1k>:
>    0:   24821000        addiu   v0,a0,4096
>    4:   7c420036        ll      v0,0(v0)
>    8:   d81f0000        jrc     ra
>    c:   00000000        nop

Can you try gcc -S instead of -c (still at -O3) to produce asm output
without assembling it?

Rich


  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-29  4:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-21  6:03 Jaydeep Patil
2016-03-21 17:37 ` dalias
2016-03-22  4:58   ` Jaydeep Patil
2016-03-22 21:22     ` Rich Felker
2016-03-23  6:37       ` Jaydeep Patil
2016-03-23 15:03         ` Rich Felker
2016-03-28  5:07           ` Jaydeep Patil
2016-03-28 13:04             ` Rich Felker
2016-03-29  2:19               ` Rich Felker
2016-03-29  3:54               ` Jaydeep Patil
2016-03-29  4:10                 ` Rich Felker [this message]
2016-03-29  7:16                   ` Jaydeep Patil
2016-03-29 13:32                     ` Rich Felker
2016-03-30  9:45                       ` Jaydeep Patil
2016-03-30 14:29                         ` Rich Felker
2016-03-30 15:28                           ` Rich Felker
2016-03-31  5:20                             ` Jaydeep Patil
2016-03-29  3:55               ` Jaydeep Patil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160329041055.GL21636@brightrain.aerifal.cx \
    --to=dalias@libc.org \
    --cc=Jaydeep.Patil@imgtec.com \
    --cc=musl@lists.openwall.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/musl/

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).