From: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Bug in timezone handling (new zonename format like '<+04>-4' )
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 12:06:47 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160331160647.GV21636@brightrain.aerifal.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7d2a2332-05ee-6f5e-7ed9-26bf7b8e1aae@iki.fi>
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 06:50:14PM +0300, Hannu Nyman wrote:
> The IANA timezone zoneinfo maintainers have decided to introduce new
> timezones in a simplified format with 2016b zoneinfo.
> No more invented name strings, but just the time offset inside <...>
> This seems to break musl.
>
> http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/tz-announce/2016-March/000036.html
> New zones Europe/Astrakhan and Europe/Ulyanovsk ... Asia/Barnaul ...
> As a trial of a new system that needs less information to be
> made up, the new zones use numeric time zone abbreviations like
> "+04" instead of invented abbreviations like "ASTT".
>
> I have tested with Openwrt trunk using musl (with Linux kernel 4.1)
> and older uClibc-based Openwrt CC15.05.1.
> The uClibc-based system uses the new zones ok, but the musl-based
> build behaves badly, as it defaults to GMT and shows the zonename as
> '+04>-4'. (This is when full zoneinfo files are not installed and
> just the TZ variable is used.)
>
> Examples at https://github.com/openwrt/luci/issues/675
>
> (note: Openwrt patches musl to store TZ in /etc/TZ instead of an env
> variable, but that should have no impact in the displayed timezone.)
>
> Example with musl:
>
> old zone is ok:
> Europe/Helsinki
> root@OpenWrt:~# cat /etc/TZ
> EET-2EEST,M3.5.0/3,M10.5.0/4
> root@OpenWrt:~# uptime
> 11:00:52 up 18:17, load average: 0.43, 0.13, 0.11
> root@OpenWrt:~# date
> Wed Mar 30 11:00:55 EEST 2016
>
> "new zone" is handle wrongly:
> Europe/Astrakhan
> root@OpenWrt:~# cat /etc/TZ
> <+04>-4
> root@OpenWrt:~# uptime
> 08:02:52 up 18:19, load average: 0.17, 0.18, 0.13
> root@OpenWrt:~# date
> Wed Mar 30 08:02:59 +04>-4 2016
> (That should be Helsinki+1 (= +2 -DST) = 12:02:59)
I thought this was some nonstandard extension conflicting with
standard handling of the TZ variable, but in fact it's documented in
current POSIX as a quoted form:
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap08.html#tag_08_03
Does the specification there agree with your expectations of how it
should behave? Do you have any other references I could look at on how
this is supposed to be used?
Rich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-31 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-31 15:50 Hannu Nyman
2016-03-31 16:06 ` Rich Felker [this message]
2016-03-31 16:47 ` Hannu Nyman
2016-10-19 6:40 ` Hannu Nyman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160331160647.GV21636@brightrain.aerifal.cx \
--to=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=musl@lists.openwall.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/musl/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).