* Rich Felker [2016-05-05 22:44:54 -0400]: > not built at all for a c/c++ only build. Other langs are completely > untested and probably don't work, but it would be nice to find out why > and fix the ones that are practical to fix. btw, for fortran --disable-libquadmath is not enough, you need --disable-libquadmath-support too, see https://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html so i think those options should be recommended together. there are patches to make java and ada frontends work (by alpine linux) but those are much less tested than the c,c++ case. > > Are you planning on supporting GCC 5.3? I may be able to contribute > > some patches. > > I suspect the same patches for 5.2 apply just fine, but I haven't > taken the time to test yet. If you can confirm they work or tweak them > so they work I'd be happy to add 5.3 support. Other versions I'd like i think the powerpc patches wont apply, but i have all my patches rebased for 5.3 > to support are 4.7.4 (last C-only, also last before some sketchy likewise. > optimizations were added) and 6.1.0, but in order to add a version it likewise. > should have proper support (at least the main musl patch with dynamic > linker names, include paths, etc. fully ported) rather than just being > enough to compile. but i didnt test these patches with mcm, they don't have the pie/fdpic/sh stuff and they might contain extra changes that probably not everyone wants.