From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/10094 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Szabolcs Nagy Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: make install permissions Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 23:45:42 +0200 Message-ID: <20160606214542.GN22574@port70.net> References: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1465249557 20132 80.91.229.3 (6 Jun 2016 21:45:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 21:45:57 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-10107-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Mon Jun 06 23:45:57 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bA2LM-0008Vs-8t for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 23:45:56 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 6000 invoked by uid 550); 6 Jun 2016 21:45:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Original-Received: (qmail 5982 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2016 21:45:54 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:10094 Archived-At: * Philip Deegan [2016-06-06 21:54:02 +0100]: > I'm trying out musl and I noticed that even when "--prefix" is used for > "configure", "make install" still tries to put a symlink in "/lib". > > Is this intentional? > of course the dynamic linker name is part of the abi, if you change that then you loose binary portability. you can still change it by configuring musl with different --syslibdir > I rather keep my system directories clean and isolate my dev stuff. > the binaries will have non-standard interpreter path in them, so they will only work with that particular path setup. > Thanks > > PS. Is there a "musl-g++.specs" floating around anywhere?