From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/10191 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Matias A. Fonzo" Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: New Exherbo+musl stage: x86_64-pc-linux-musl-20160621 Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 12:57:04 -0300 Organization: Dragora GNU/Linux-Libre Message-ID: <20160622125704.13795179@rafaela> References: <20160621202207.32c23d4b@rafaela> <644E2E3D-9870-4FBC-9463-F70E1129FB98@shiz.me> <20160622122030.61bfcd2b@rafaela> <02193727-F911-45D1-A2BA-289592DD6460@shiz.me> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/HNAPwkFa9oblrlcZv8EQSA+"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1466610470 25141 80.91.229.3 (22 Jun 2016 15:47:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 15:47:50 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-10204-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Wed Jun 22 17:47:44 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bFkNR-0002o3-EI for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 17:47:41 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 1643 invoked by uid 550); 22 Jun 2016 15:47:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Original-Received: (qmail 1622 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2016 15:47:38 -0000 In-Reply-To: <02193727-F911-45D1-A2BA-289592DD6460@shiz.me> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-dragora-linux-gnu) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:10191 Archived-At: --Sig_/HNAPwkFa9oblrlcZv8EQSA+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El Wed, 22 Jun 2016 17:32:47 +0200 Shiz escribi=C3=B3: > > On 22 Jun 2016, at 17:20, Matias A. Fonzo wrote: > >=20 > > Distribute files and impose to your users in having xz, is a bad > > idea. =20 >=20 > I don=E2=80=99t think you understand what I said. Technical arguments abo= ut > the superiority of your format aren=E2=80=99t particularly relevant if the > user can=E2=80=99t decompress it in the first place. >=20 > - Shiz >=20 I understand that you are losing in make the right thing just for the availability of a bad implementation. If the user can't decompress is really your main concern, think in the RAM usage as a possible limitation (among other things). --=20 GPG pub ID =3D 0x3AAF1CEC203A99D5 Key servers =3D hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net - keys.gnupg.net Key fingerprint =3D 35BD B9D4 6B56 B5FA CB64 7C9B 3AAF 1CEC 203A 99D5 --Sig_/HNAPwkFa9oblrlcZv8EQSA+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: Firma digital OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJXarVQXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQzNUJEQjlENDZCNTZCNUZBQ0I2NDdDOUIz QUFGMUNFQzIwM0E5OUQ1AAoJEDqvHOwgOpnViloQAICV6a0g0znxAjLpl1uRpYnE 22R/0f6PPbwcABSKheht3R12RHhrkQLTvXKWMqJ2acL5S73wS7jfXZBWOR0h65TH HydZBVeUkXkUOA9SBt2xRvNeXkcX/cz0kblM1YBE2iqmb8hZxcXvCMhcU7uq7qRm TKNHVmvxXoc2Zlh9wehNyjJWliuat0i7GhT0I+IFPZaIlZj6Y58xcP4az1O3qoQW a/onoIqW1z/ORZaH2YlVuzGmpWtJjOgwiSBUAt4Z4ugMkfSfiHDLWR755rTtCYxI RZM/RwBoT1YMcwjo3LO5qm+xYdT23EUm/viT+2p+LlWxO2YTCfDHP6Zf0bCoYGXg jh0yPUhvA3OYyxWwTa7l4h/kFIMiIlLN219VBX9bevYt0MN9dy081LcR7ACN+Isw jVxKb387kJTb23GUXfcDG1cZ8aBsT2KYFMPqQaVaAcXCtjkq/t+eflHZO8yl6hSq Gpx94u+3xsEYtRUOteW8f5Hor/Lxk3die9yYF+Ifa9yS9/S0JVksQGIq5vGRfBek 1RxhbDpHdG7kEVjowtrHmsFk3q9nbfP1hHDjo8IDNlw2X4ggVF45h6JywvrXZStS cKE6etj7ONaCxYDIFvjAzL5TGB4sLDoNeXm2B0nMjZg9P1DjTLb/6u9iCh7TPgwZ c4kUc55xPzCNmBL7Ehha =kLVw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/HNAPwkFa9oblrlcZv8EQSA+--