From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/10223 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rich Felker Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: musl ldd: swt build: Error relocating / symbol not found Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 17:41:35 -0400 Message-ID: <20160624214135.GC10893@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: <576B58E6.6040400@gmail.com> <20160623042448.GX10893@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <576C02C2.7070006@gmail.com> <20160623171008.GY10893@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <576C3BB4.3010307@gmail.com> <20160623231527.GZ22574@port70.net> <576D5E9B.4070608@gmail.com> <20160624170347.GB10893@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1466804524 28336 80.91.229.3 (24 Jun 2016 21:42:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 21:42:04 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-10236-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Fri Jun 24 23:42:03 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bGYrM-0003YR-Uu for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 23:42:00 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 29834 invoked by uid 550); 24 Jun 2016 21:41:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Original-Received: (qmail 29812 invoked from network); 24 Jun 2016 21:41:48 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Original-Sender: Rich Felker Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:10223 Archived-At: On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 08:17:00PM +0300, Alexander Monakov wrote: > On Fri, 24 Jun 2016, Rich Felker wrote: > > OK, this is likely the root of the problem: invalid code assuming that > > it can load libraries with undefined symbols as long as it doesn't try > > to use those code paths. > > No, this does not explain the issue: as the first message in thread shows, the > symbol is defined in libgobject, and if it wasn't, ldd would detect that. So > we still don't have the root cause. Oh, thanks for catching that... Sorry for the noise. Rich