* clockspeed
@ 2016-07-13 19:04 Jorge Almeida
2016-07-13 19:42 ` clockspeed Rich Felker
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jorge Almeida @ 2016-07-13 19:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: musl
Has anyone compiled clockspeed against musl, in a x86_64?
If so, would you share conf-cc and conf-ld?
Thanks
Jorge Almeida
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: clockspeed
2016-07-13 19:04 clockspeed Jorge Almeida
@ 2016-07-13 19:42 ` Rich Felker
2016-07-13 20:10 ` clockspeed Jorge Almeida
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rich Felker @ 2016-07-13 19:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: musl
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 12:04:36PM -0700, Jorge Almeida wrote:
> Has anyone compiled clockspeed against musl, in a x86_64?
I'm guessing you mean DJB's package, but the name is generic enough
that I can't be sure. Next time try to be more clear.
> If so, would you share conf-cc and conf-ld?
I just did as a test and it has some obvious issues like missing and
wrong prototypes for standard functions and "extern int errno;" rather
than #include <errno.h> (the latter is DJB's willfully wrong code to
make a point that he likes being wrong), but it compiled "ok" after
changing error.h. No idea if it works.
I didn't modify conf-cc or conf-ld at all because the native gcc
targets musl, but if you wanted to cross-compile it would probably
work putting the name of your cross compiler there, or the musl-gcc
wrapper even.
Rich
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: clockspeed
2016-07-13 19:42 ` clockspeed Rich Felker
@ 2016-07-13 20:10 ` Jorge Almeida
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jorge Almeida @ 2016-07-13 20:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: musl
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 12:04:36PM -0700, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>> Has anyone compiled clockspeed against musl, in a x86_64?
>
> I'm guessing you mean DJB's package,
Indeed.
but the name is generic enough
> that I can't be sure. Next time try to be more clear.
I had no idea there was some other package with the same name.
>
>> If so, would you share conf-cc and conf-ld?
>
> I just did as a test and it has some obvious issues like missing and
> wrong prototypes for standard functions and "extern int errno;" rather
> than #include <errno.h> (the latter is DJB's willfully wrong code to
> make a point that he likes being wrong), but it compiled "ok" after
> changing error.h. No idea if it works.
>
> I didn't modify conf-cc or conf-ld at all because the native gcc
> targets musl, but if you wanted to cross-compile it would probably
> work putting the name of your cross compiler there, or the musl-gcc
> wrapper even.
>
I'm not cross-compiling, but the distro is not musl-based. Yes, I put
the wrapper in conf-cc and conf-ld.
I've been using clockspeed for years (with < 5ms discrepancy relative
to the NTP server, on crappy hardware). But I had it compiled against
dietlibc long ago (in x86), and now it doesn't compile against dietlib
nor against musl. Just wondering if x86_64 brings about some extra
problem.
Jorge
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-07-13 20:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-07-13 19:04 clockspeed Jorge Almeida
2016-07-13 19:42 ` clockspeed Rich Felker
2016-07-13 20:10 ` clockspeed Jorge Almeida
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/musl/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).