* clockspeed @ 2016-07-13 19:04 Jorge Almeida 2016-07-13 19:42 ` clockspeed Rich Felker 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Jorge Almeida @ 2016-07-13 19:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: musl Has anyone compiled clockspeed against musl, in a x86_64? If so, would you share conf-cc and conf-ld? Thanks Jorge Almeida ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: clockspeed 2016-07-13 19:04 clockspeed Jorge Almeida @ 2016-07-13 19:42 ` Rich Felker 2016-07-13 20:10 ` clockspeed Jorge Almeida 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Rich Felker @ 2016-07-13 19:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: musl On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 12:04:36PM -0700, Jorge Almeida wrote: > Has anyone compiled clockspeed against musl, in a x86_64? I'm guessing you mean DJB's package, but the name is generic enough that I can't be sure. Next time try to be more clear. > If so, would you share conf-cc and conf-ld? I just did as a test and it has some obvious issues like missing and wrong prototypes for standard functions and "extern int errno;" rather than #include <errno.h> (the latter is DJB's willfully wrong code to make a point that he likes being wrong), but it compiled "ok" after changing error.h. No idea if it works. I didn't modify conf-cc or conf-ld at all because the native gcc targets musl, but if you wanted to cross-compile it would probably work putting the name of your cross compiler there, or the musl-gcc wrapper even. Rich ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: clockspeed 2016-07-13 19:42 ` clockspeed Rich Felker @ 2016-07-13 20:10 ` Jorge Almeida 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Jorge Almeida @ 2016-07-13 20:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: musl On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 12:04:36PM -0700, Jorge Almeida wrote: >> Has anyone compiled clockspeed against musl, in a x86_64? > > I'm guessing you mean DJB's package, Indeed. but the name is generic enough > that I can't be sure. Next time try to be more clear. I had no idea there was some other package with the same name. > >> If so, would you share conf-cc and conf-ld? > > I just did as a test and it has some obvious issues like missing and > wrong prototypes for standard functions and "extern int errno;" rather > than #include <errno.h> (the latter is DJB's willfully wrong code to > make a point that he likes being wrong), but it compiled "ok" after > changing error.h. No idea if it works. > > I didn't modify conf-cc or conf-ld at all because the native gcc > targets musl, but if you wanted to cross-compile it would probably > work putting the name of your cross compiler there, or the musl-gcc > wrapper even. > I'm not cross-compiling, but the distro is not musl-based. Yes, I put the wrapper in conf-cc and conf-ld. I've been using clockspeed for years (with < 5ms discrepancy relative to the NTP server, on crappy hardware). But I had it compiled against dietlibc long ago (in x86), and now it doesn't compile against dietlib nor against musl. Just wondering if x86_64 brings about some extra problem. Jorge ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-07-13 20:10 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2016-07-13 19:04 clockspeed Jorge Almeida 2016-07-13 19:42 ` clockspeed Rich Felker 2016-07-13 20:10 ` clockspeed Jorge Almeida
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/musl/ This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).