From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/10506 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Rich Felker Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Add fortify _chk functions Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 22:52:32 -0400 Message-ID: <20160920025232.GF15995@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: <20160919224302.GE15995@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1474339977 30798 195.159.176.226 (20 Sep 2016 02:52:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 02:52:57 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: musl@lists.openwall.com To: Laine Gholson Original-X-From: musl-return-10519-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Tue Sep 20 04:52:53 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by blaine.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bmBAy-0007Hq-5d for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 04:52:52 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 24352 invoked by uid 550); 20 Sep 2016 02:52:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Original-Received: (qmail 24329 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2016 02:52:51 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Original-Sender: Rich Felker Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:10506 Archived-At: On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 05:45:26PM -0500, Laine Gholson wrote: > On 09/19/16 17:43, Rich Felker wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 05:38:01PM -0500, Laine Gholson wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> I have attached a proof of concept patch that adds > >> many of glibc's fortify *_chk functions to musl, improving > >> musl's binary compatibility with glibc. > >> > >> Please reply. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Laine Gholson > > > > I haven't read the patch yet, but have you compared it to the > > existing, long-pending patch? It had some open issues that have still > > not been addressed. > > Can you send me a link to the other patch? Here's the thread: http://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2015/06/17/1 Rich