From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>,
"Johannes Schindelin" <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
Git <git@vger.kernel.org>,
musl@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Regression: git no longer works with musl libc's regex impl
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 15:28:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161006192811.xy5iahvczigfgapa@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161006192500.GS19318@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 03:25:00PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> > No, I think that is the exact purpose of configure.ac and autoconf.
> >
> > It would be neat if we could auto-fallback during the build. Rich
> > suggested always compiling compat/regex.c, and just having it be a noop
> > at the preprocessor level. I'm not sure if that would work, though,
> > because we'd have to include the system "regex.h" to know if we have
> > REG_STARTEND, at which point it is potentially too late to compile our
> > own regex routines (we're potentially going to conflict with the system
> > declarations).
>
> If you have autoconf testing for REG_STARTEND at configure time then
> compat/regex.c can #include "config.h" and test for HAVE_REG_STARTEND
> rather than for REG_STARTEND, or something like that.
Right, that part is easy; we do not even have to touch compat/regex.c,
because we already have such a knob in the Makefile (NO_REGEX), and
autoconf just needs to tweak that knob.
My question was whether we could do it without running a separate
compile (via autoconf or via the Makefile), and I think the answer is
"no".
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-06 19:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-04 15:08 Rich Felker
2016-10-04 15:27 ` Jeff King
2016-10-04 15:40 ` Rich Felker
2016-10-04 16:08 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-10-04 16:11 ` Rich Felker
2016-10-04 17:16 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-10-04 18:00 ` Ray Donnelly
2016-10-04 17:29 ` Kurt H Maier
2016-10-04 17:33 ` Julien Ramseier
2016-10-04 17:36 ` Rich Felker
2016-10-04 17:39 ` [musl] " Rich Felker
2016-10-05 11:17 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-10-05 13:01 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2016-10-05 13:15 ` Rich Felker
2016-10-04 22:06 ` [musl] " James B
2016-10-04 22:33 ` Rich Felker
2016-10-04 22:48 ` [musl] " Junio C Hamano
2016-10-05 13:11 ` Jakub Narębski
2016-10-05 16:15 ` Rich Felker
2016-10-05 10:41 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-10-05 11:59 ` [musl] " James B
2016-10-05 16:11 ` Jeff King
2016-10-05 16:27 ` Rich Felker
2016-10-06 10:44 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-10-06 19:18 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2016-10-06 19:23 ` Jeff King
2016-10-06 19:25 ` Rich Felker
2016-10-06 19:28 ` Jeff King [this message]
2016-10-06 22:42 ` Ramsay Jones
2016-10-07 11:30 ` Jakub Narębski
2016-10-04 16:01 ` Johannes Schindelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161006192811.xy5iahvczigfgapa@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=musl@lists.openwall.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/musl/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).