From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/10604
Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Bobby Bingham <koorogi@koorogi.info>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: Re: 32 bit musl?
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2016 10:10:36 -0500
Message-ID: <20161009151036.GA25506@dora.lan>
References: <CAGDMk9H3Gwj1NMCOhiCJjGc0zrXj-_+i12z6jBS6V=zCeepWNw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGDMk9HiUU4Jqz4RURO82_jc9bzSkOepFJfa1B0AXP6rcs6hmg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGDMk9GidwCL0gMyJ0-YBeJYKM1aUuHt01jik7bhbWZr3RTNUA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20161009144443.GA28065@port70.net>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1476025868 6666 195.159.176.226 (9 Oct 2016 15:11:08 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2016 15:11:08 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.0 (2016-08-17)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com, John Mudd <johnbmudd@gmail.com>
Original-X-From: musl-return-10617-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sun Oct 09 17:11:01 2016
Return-path: <musl-return-10617-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by blaine.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-10617-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1btFkY-0007st-BN
	for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2016 17:10:50 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 15438 invoked by uid 550); 9 Oct 2016 15:10:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-ID: <musl.lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 15414 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2016 15:10:49 -0000
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20161009144443.GA28065@port70.net>
X-Operating-System: Linux dora 4.4.21 
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:10604
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/10604>

On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 04:44:44PM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> * John Mudd <johnbmudd@gmail.com> [2016-10-09 10:29:02 -0400]:
> > On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 9:55 PM, John Mudd <johnbmudd@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Rich's musl-cross-make builds 32-bit executables that use musl libs. It
> > > kills two birds with one stone. That's great.
> > >
> > > But it appears to expect musl libc to be installed in /lib for dynamically
> > > linked executables. That's not an option for me. Is there a way I can
> > > override this?
> > >
> > >
> > Thanks Laurent, I used symbolic link in /lib for testing on my development
> > machine. That works well. But I don't have reasonable access to root user
> > when I deploy for production.
> 
> deploy static linked binary or use explicit -Wl,-dynamic-linker

Using -Wl,-dynamic-linker will result in binaries that will not run on
normal musl systems.

If you can deploy the musl libc alongside your program, you can invoke it
as `/path/to/libc.so /path/to/your/program`.  This can be done by a shell
script you also deploy.