From: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: kernel header compatibility
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 20:39:30 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161109013930.GI1555@brightrain.aerifal.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161109011145.GA31880@nyan>
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 08:11:45PM -0500, Felix Janda wrote:
> The recent commit 04983f2272382af92eb8f8838964ff944fbb8258 (make
> netinet/in.h suppress clashing definitions from kernel headers)
> intends to address some of the conflicts between the kernel and musl
> libc headers. Namely it tries to allow the inclusion of kernel headers
> after libc header by defining __UAP_DEF_* macros. However this doesn't
> work because the relevant linux headers include <linux/libc-compat.h>,
> which unconditionally redefines the constants. For example
Oh, how awful. I missed the whole bogus #else part after the #if
defined(__GLIBC__) block.
>
> #include <netinet/in.h>
> #include <linux/in6.h>
>
> leads to
>
> #define __UAPI_DEF_IN_ADDR 0 // from <netinet/in.h>
> #define __UAPI_DEF_IN_ADDR 1 // from <linux/libc-compat.h>
Conflicting defines should be an error already.
> So we still get two conflicting definitions of struct in6_addr.
>
>
> By adding the hack "#define _LIBC_COMPAT_H" to <netinet/in.h>, this
> particular example compiles.
>
>
> Maybe the kernel people can be convinced to add #ifdef guards around
> all of the (non glibc) __UAPI_* definitions in <linux/libc-compat.h>.
I think they should, but I don't mind just suppressing the whole
header by defining _UAPI_LIBC_COMPAT_H if that works for all kernel
versions. It seems to; see:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/include/uapi/linux/libc-compat.h?id=cfd280c91253cc28e4919e349fa7a813b63e71e8
where the file was introduced.
Rich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-09 1:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-09 1:11 Felix Janda
2016-11-09 1:39 ` Rich Felker [this message]
2016-11-09 1:54 ` Felix Janda
2016-11-09 2:14 ` Rich Felker
2016-11-10 1:28 ` Felix Janda
2016-11-10 4:39 ` Rich Felker
2016-11-10 9:21 ` Szabolcs Nagy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161109013930.GI1555@brightrain.aerifal.cx \
--to=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=musl@lists.openwall.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/musl/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).