From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/10745 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Rich Felker Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Robust shared mutexes? Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2016 17:56:18 -0500 Message-ID: <20161126225617.GW1555@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: <20161126214943.GA2635@hotdamn.lan> <20161126222443.GV1555@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20161126225104.GA2151@hotdamn.lan> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1480200997 23347 195.159.176.226 (26 Nov 2016 22:56:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2016 22:56:37 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: musl@lists.openwall.com To: Sebastian Kemper Original-X-From: musl-return-10758-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sat Nov 26 23:56:31 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by blaine.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cAltX-00058D-Ad for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 23:56:31 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 22105 invoked by uid 550); 26 Nov 2016 22:56:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Original-Received: (qmail 22084 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2016 22:56:33 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161126225104.GA2151@hotdamn.lan> Original-Sender: Rich Felker Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:10745 Archived-At: On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 11:51:05PM +0100, Sebastian Kemper wrote: > On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 05:24:43PM -0500, Rich Felker wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 10:49:44PM +0100, Sebastian Kemper wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > > > I'm cross-compiling for OpenWRT/LEDE and have this variable > > > apr_cv_mutex_robust_shared. Should I set it to yes or no with musl? I've > > > searched around but found conflicting infos. One post said there's no > > > shared mutex support in musl > > > > Do you have a link for that? If there's incorrect information I'd like > > to reply and see if it can be corrected. > > Hello Rich, > > Thank you very much for the reply! > > I looked for the link and it turns out it was an error on my part. The > post wasn't referring to robust shared mutexes. It was regarding process > shared mutexes > > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2016-March/119214.html > > It says musl doesn't have process shared mutexes so one should set > apr_cv_process_shared_works=no. I take it that is correct? No, it's incorrect and I have no idea where that idea came from. I'll ask Khem. Rich