From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/10746
Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@port70.net>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: Robust shared mutexes?
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2016 00:01:10 +0100
Message-ID: <20161126230110.GX5749@port70.net>
References: <20161126214943.GA2635@hotdamn.lan>
 <20161126222443.GV1555@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <20161126225104.GA2151@hotdamn.lan>
 <20161126225617.GW1555@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1480201287 27727 195.159.176.226 (26 Nov 2016 23:01:27 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2016 23:01:27 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01)
Cc: Sebastian Kemper <sebastian_ml@gmx.net>
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-10759-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sun Nov 27 00:01:22 2016
Return-path: <musl-return-10759-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by blaine.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-10759-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1cAlyD-0006TS-Gu
	for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2016 00:01:21 +0100
Original-Received: (qmail 24476 invoked by uid 550); 26 Nov 2016 23:01:23 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-ID: <musl.lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 24456 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2016 23:01:22 -0000
Mail-Followup-To: musl@lists.openwall.com,
	Sebastian Kemper <sebastian_ml@gmx.net>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20161126225617.GW1555@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:10746
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/10746>

* Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> [2016-11-26 17:56:18 -0500]:
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 11:51:05PM +0100, Sebastian Kemper wrote:
> > 
> > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2016-March/119214.html
> > 
> > It says musl doesn't have process shared mutexes so one should set
> > apr_cv_process_shared_works=no. I take it that is correct?
> 
> No, it's incorrect and I have no idea where that idea came from. I'll
> ask Khem.
> 

apr might care about sharing mutexes across i386 vs x86_64 ?

that does not work (glibc ditto)