From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/10802
Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@port70.net>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: Handling of L and ll prefixes different from glibc
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 12:30:42 +0100
Message-ID: <20161215113041.GJ16379@port70.net>
References: <CANEVyjtv7+kqyDjyYiSv7yq7YLvvJo9Ti0PSGcjQ3dVMgjqF1w@mail.gmail.com>
 <20161214161348.GU1555@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <20161214171756.GH16379@port70.net>
 <5851C9C3.6050609@adelielinux.org>
 <20161215023042.GW1555@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <585215B7.2070507@adelielinux.org>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1481801463 11800 195.159.176.226 (15 Dec 2016 11:31:03 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 11:31:03 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-10815-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Thu Dec 15 12:30:56 2016
Return-path: <musl-return-10815-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by blaine.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-10815-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1cHUFP-0001hz-JF
	for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 12:30:51 +0100
Original-Received: (qmail 26100 invoked by uid 550); 15 Dec 2016 11:30:54 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-ID: <musl.lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 26082 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2016 11:30:54 -0000
Mail-Followup-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <585215B7.2070507@adelielinux.org>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:10802
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/10802>

* A. Wilcox <awilfox@adelielinux.org> [2016-12-14 22:01:59 -0600]:
> On 14/12/16 20:30, Rich Felker wrote:
> > BTW I wonder if gcc's -Wformat catches these errors.
> 
> It is meant to.  I know that clang whines loudly on mismatched format
> specifiers, and I seem to recall it even whines on format specifiers
> that don't exist, but it has been a while since I checked GCC's.

despite clang propaganda, gcc actually has more detailed model
of printf now and thus gives better warnings

https://godbolt.org/g/Z0nnEH

note that clang does not warn at all, while gcc caught two bugs.