From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/11559 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Szabolcs Nagy Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: uncommitted libc-test additions (?) Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 01:40:26 +0200 Message-ID: <20170622234026.GN27071@port70.net> References: <20170622231457.GL1627@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1498174839 8967 195.159.176.226 (22 Jun 2017 23:40:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 23:40:39 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-11572-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Fri Jun 23 01:40:36 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by blaine.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dOBiF-00027L-P4 for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 01:40:35 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 17505 invoked by uid 550); 22 Jun 2017 23:40:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Original-Received: (qmail 17484 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2017 23:40:38 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170622231457.GL1627@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:11559 Archived-At: * Rich Felker [2017-06-22 19:14:58 -0400]: > I found these in my local libc-test checkout. Some of them might have > been duplicated or superseded by other tests or committed at different > locations, but likely they were just overlooked: > > src/common/utf8.c > src/functional/clocale_mbfuncs.c > src/regression/iconv-roundtrips.c > src/regression/uselocale-0.c > > I also have a file called src/regression/malloc-brk-fail-under.c, but > it looks like work I started on a test related to malloc-brk-fail.c > and never finished. > > utf8.c doesn't actually seem to be used by anything, and I don't > remember where it came from, but it should be useful for testing utf-8 > related functionality. ok i added all of them to libc-test